通用banner
您当前的位置 : 首 页 > 热推信息

联系我们Contact Us

蓝鲸体育

联系:鲍经理              

手机:13700027149

联系:曹经理

手机:13700027149

电话:0512-3687 3773  

          13700027149

邮箱:contact@style-lanjingty.com

地址:河北省 江岸区 天府大道162号

这是《卫报》的报道要点:爱尔兰足协(FAI)拟向欧足联(UEFA)提交正式提案,敦促对以色列实施参赛禁令。

2024-01-25

Summarizing UEFA context

I can respond without browsing since this is a reported headline. I should provide context about UEFA rules and the precedent involving Russia’s suspension. I want to mention procedural aspects like how national associations can propose agenda items to UEFA Congress. Israeli clubs have been allowed to play at neutral venues. I need to note the temporary suspension of matches in Israel during 2023-24 and consider the potential for a vote by Ireland's FAI. Let’s ensure we phrase this carefully as reported by The Guardian.Clarifying UEFA process

I need to be cautious since my knowledge cuts off in October 2024 and the current date is December 29, 2025, so I can’t invent post-cutoff facts. If the user's headline is from The Guardian, it might relate to events from early 2024. I can’t verify real-time details but can offer context on UEFA's processes and implications, referring to Article 65 of the UEFA statutes, which involves suspension or expulsion of clubs. I’ll provide information on proposals related to UEFA Congress or Executive Committee as necessary.Considering UEFA's potential actions

程也\n

It seems likely that UEFA would avoid a ban on Israel, as they've previously only limited venue changes. Excluding Israeli teams from competitions could have significant impacts, like affecting EURO qualifiers and potential player transfers. I need to check what the user wants: more details, source links, or context. I could summarize the situation concisely, focusing on the reported proposal from FAI regarding an Israel ban and how it compares to the Russia ban, emphasizing that it’s an unprecedented step.Understanding UEFA's procedures

I realize this is about how UEFA and FIFA took joint action in response to invasion and security issues, including a CAS case. I need to clarify the procedural aspects: the UEFA Executive Committee can make urgent decisions, while the Control, Ethics and Disciplinary Body (CEDB) deals with disciplinary matters. However, membership suspensions likely fall to the Executive Committee with emergency powers. The Congress has a role in suspending and expelling associations as well, but I’ll keep it more general and avoid specific statute numbers.Structuring the response carefully

I need to phrase this carefully to avoid making inaccurate claims. It seems politically sensitive, and UEFA usually avoids political sanctions unless it involves safety or force majeure. Given that Israeli clubs have been playing at neutral venues, a ban seems unlikely without broader political consensus, like what happened with Russia. If a ban is adopted, competitions could be impacted, and it might trigger CAS appeals. I can offer to fetch the Guardian article and highlight key points, staying concise with 5-6 bullet points.

这是《卫报》的报道要点:爱尔兰足协(FAI)拟向欧足联(UEFA)提交正式提案,敦促对以色列实施参赛禁令。

背景与脉络

  • UEFA一贯以“安全/赛事完整性”为由处理冲突相关问题,通常做法是改期或安排中立场,而非政治性禁赛;以色列球队此前多次被要求在中立地比赛。
  • 先例是2022年对俄罗斯的联合禁赛(UEFA+FIFA),该决定曾被上诉至CAS,最终维持;这属于极为例外的情形,且有广泛的国际体育治理共识背书。
  • “提案”本身不等于通过:是否禁赛通常由UEFA执委会与纪律机构裁决,重大成员资格处置可能涉及UEFA大会;任何禁赛决定几乎必然会面临上诉与法律审查。
  • 被上\n

如果禁赛获通过(假设)

  • 以色列国家队将被排除在欧国联、欧洲杯预选等国家队赛事之外。
  • 以色列俱乐部将无法参加欧冠/欧联/欧协联当季与后续赛季(视决定时点与期限)。
  • 球员的个人注册不受影响,但其所在俱乐部的欧战资格受限;已有赛程将被判弃权或重新安排(依具体裁决)。

现实可行性与时间轴

    没有广泛共\n

  • 没有广泛共识时,此类禁赛通过概率较低;UEFA倾向以赛程与安保技术方案应对。
  • 即便被列入议程,也可能经历多轮内部讨论与法律评估,短期落地并不容易。

需要我帮你查找该报道的原文链接、关键引述与各方回应,或跟进UEFA的正式表态吗?

标签

上一篇:闵行区专业cnc对外加工厂2024-01-25
下一篇:江阴专业数控铣床加工厂2024-01-25

联系我们

联系: 鲍经理               手机:13700027149

           曹经理               手机:13700027149   

13700027149

河北省 江岸区 天府大道162号

关注我们

  1.jpg 二维码 (4).png

扫一扫

关注我们